Why I’m Done With SPJ, ONA & Others – NewsGeeks

March 12, 2009

Letters asking for renewal dues start popping up in my mailbox around this time of year. I’ve received one from my local NPR affiliate station, about a hundred from Wired Magazine and two from the Society of Professional Journalists. The amount of funding each letter is requesting isn’t terribly unreasonable… mostly.

I won’t be sending in my membership dues to the SPJ. This is the first year I’m not being counted as a student so the dues are significantly higher. Sure, I can afford to pay them, but I’m not so sure I want to bother. It’s been well over a year since a local chapter scheduled a meeting — and even when those meeting actually happened, it was always a $25 meal and I never quite connected with any of the contacts I’d made.

For me, it was listening to fundamentals of journalism, and its hard not to see value in that. But the climate has changed. The conversation has shifted to financial models and how to best use technology at a news organization.

If I were seeking information about using technology effectively or how to run a business, the very LAST place I would look is at an SPJ meeting. I’m sorry, but that’s the god’s honest truth.

Other organizations that are geared more towards the discussion of online media aren’t much better. Most of the people who are in charge come from the organizations with the most problems. It’s not their fault of course, but their perspective is skewed. They are talking to large groups of journalists who don’t know how to best use technology and social media within their reporting, and they don’t have much of a clue either — not because they aren’t intelligent but again, because they are unable to bring forth a different perspective.

I love my fellow journalists. I think they are smart, resourceful and nearly always interesting to converse with. I tend to hang out with a lot of people who are just like that but who aren’t journalists. With the way the economy is going combined with the outlook on our industry’s job growth, pretty soon we’ll all be former editors, reports, writers, anchors and producers. We’ll all just be citizens sitting around a pub table evangelizing about news. And at that point we’ll all need to be journalists. Every one of us.

That’s why the NewsGeeks meetup was formed. I want the community, I don’t want the emotions from the industry. I don’t want an agenda or a topic of discussion. I just want to chat with other people who like to dissect the news and how the news travels on social media.

I’m not against the SPJ or ONA…(or any other journalistic organization for that matter) because they do a lot of activism that most people wouldn’t realize. But the community in the pre existing organizations is as gone for me as the job openings at metro newspapers.


NashMash Lists 50 Most Influential Twitter Users in Nashville

January 4, 2009

Who are Nashville’s most influential Twitter users?nashmash

Community site NashMash, a new mashup consisting of only Nashville residents, has created a list of most influential users based on information from their twitter updates. The site launched a public beta January 1 that features the 50 most influential users, as well as its localized twitter feed, user directory and 50 most active users. Read the rest of this entry »


Follow up: My Chat with Founder of Uproxx Media

October 15, 2008

A few days ago I wrote about digg.com’s ill explained actions involving the banning of power users and the inclusion of shiny new blog network Uproxx Media, which I couldn’t find much information about. After doing some research I was able to track down the founder Jarret Myer, who was kind enough to speak with me briefly over the phone.

Jarret, who has logged over a decade working in the music and entertainment business, said he decided to start Uproxx after realizing well written, well produced blogs were far more interesting than anything else going on in the entertainment industry. In early 2008 he approached the owners of blogs that fit this description – With Leather, Flim Drunk, Rawkus and five others – and formed Uproxx. The network just recently gained attention after signing with the ad agency YB Media and getting noticed for their integration with digg.com.

Previously I wondered if there was some kind of financial agreement between the two companies, since Uproxx — as an up and coming blog network — had more to gain than digg. That’s not actually true. Uproxx’s reason for an affiliation is just the most obvious, while digg’s is shrouded in silence (not because they won’t talk, but because no one is asking.)

“We don’t have access to a huge bank trust with a lot of money,” Jarret said during the conversation. He described their efforts as more grassroots, which luckily caught the attention of someone over at digg.

And by the way, it was digg who approached Jarret about the integration and not the other way around. If you think about it from digg’s perspective, they don’t have much of a community in the categories of music, entertainment and sports. Sure diggers like that stuff, but that’s not what brings them to the site. So, approaching Uproxx, whose specialty is in those areas, makes a lot of sense.

Why else would digg top brass decide to pick Uproxx over other networks who are more established? Honestly I don’t know because I haven’t spoken to anyone at digg (Kevin, Jay – feel free to get in touch.) If I had to guess though, I’d say it was because of several things: The blogs have a streamlined design that is similar for every site in the Uproxx family. The content was selected by Jarret on the basis of quality and each of the Uproxx blogs sustained themselves independently prior to getting networked, meaning they’ll be worthy of reading. Plus, there is a greater incentive for Uproxx to strive for more digg integration than Gawker Media sites, which have had digg buttons for as long as I can recall.

Digging Up More Questions

So I understand why Uproxx is on digg even though we didn’t know who they were a month ago. The real question the community should be asking is how this will play out in the future:  Can the top diggers create a network of blogs and get the same attention? How about another network of good blogs? What’s the criteria for getting featured?

Digg will have to do more than confront these issues if they want to keep the faith of their most dedicated fans.


Digg – Uproxx Media In, Power Users Out

October 13, 2008

Uproxx.com is “a blog network for news and opinion on sports, movies, music, celebrities, fights, gossip, and more” or in other words a clone similar to Gawker Media, which has an insanely large impact for folks who exclusively get their news online. But unlike gawker, I hadn’t heard anything about Uproxx Media until two weeks ago when a banner for the new “Blog Network” popped up on digg.com under the “Integrating with digg”  header. Usually this is where  pronounced media companies like the Wall Street Journal, CBS News, etc. are displayed on the site but recently the rotation has included Uproxx and a handful of its blogs (filmdrunk and withleather).

Not surprisingly, the Uproxx network did not exist prior to a month ago or at the very least it wasn’t indexed by Google very well, which is pretty much the same thing. According to The Way Back Machine the blogs that make up Uproxx’s network did exist — some dating back two years or more — but It is safe to say the network itself is virtually unknown. This made it all the more difficult to find information about the company.

Who owns Uproxx Media and why can’t I find any information freely available online? The only significant piece of information I could find was about their recently inked a deal to be represented by the advertising network YBN Media, who’s client base includes Fark.com and Yardbarker. The positioning on digg makes sense now that they have a worthy ad network behind them, but what is unclear is why digg would promote a virtually unknown blog network. Uproxx can’t possibly deliver a comparible level of traffic to digg.com and it does little to improve the legitimacy of digg as a news gatherer the way the Wall Street Journal could. I’d be interested to find out the reasoning behind this choice.

About the same time Uproxx was featured on digg, something else noteworthy happened: Digg top brass made the decision to ban several of its most active users. The first notable banning was of digg’s third most popular submitter Reg Saddler a.k.a. Zaibatisu and they continued steadily with large groups of users being removed for violating the site’s terms of service. The most referenced reason for banning is due to use of user scripts to artificially alter digg’s heart: the algorithm for choosing front page stories. But not every user received an explanation for why they were banned and not all banned users used scripts.

So we have no definitive reason for the mass banning of highly active digg users and we do not know why newcomer Uproxx Media is featured on the site or who owns them (YBN Media?). I’m not in any position to insinuate that these two things are related. I’m simply describing two notable developments about the site.

Yet, I can’t help but wonder…

Developing


‘WTF is Social Media’ Slide Presentation

October 5, 2008

If you’ve ever had a friend who just doesn’t “get” social media, this slide show is very helpful. Thanks to Jack Lail for sharing:


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.