Nashville Developer Makes Purring iPhone App (Follow-up)

January 4, 2009

Below is an article I did after interviewing the folks at Sitening. Its a follow up from my earlier post when they launched their first iPhone app. My efforts to have it published elsewhere were unsuccessful, so I thought I’d share it on the blog.

picture-5

A local business is taking their love for apple’s iPhone to new heights by creating an application that mimics the purring of an affectionate kitten.

“We’ve been joking around the office that we can now ‘pet our pet,’” said Alison Groves, an employee at Sitening, the company that produced the “Purr” application, which in some cases can seem like an electronic pet with all the fun and none of the responsibility.picture-6

The application works by stroking the phone’s sensitive touch screen to invoke both the familiar kitty sound and the vibration mechanism. By default, the screen features a picture of a cat propped upright with its belly exposed, however, users have the option of uploading their own picture. In future updates, the company plans to add the ability to record your own sound as well.

It’s the first application published by the Nashville-based Sitening, although not the first they’ve made according to founding partner Jon Henshaw.

“When the xCode was released (which is sort of a make-your-own-app starter kit from apple) we made a few different programs,” including one involving Haikus and another that served as a simple flashlight, he said. “In the end we chose to do the Purr app over others because it was fun but didn’t require a lot of resources.”

Beyond its sheer entertainment value, the Purr app doesn’t sever any other purpose for the typical person. It’s is offered as a free download at the apple store yet, the company did have a motive in releasing it despite the lack of revenue it will bring in.

“We all like to make things, and at the same time we like to devote a small percentage of our time to making things that aren’t business related, but just fun,” said Henshaw, who added that the company doesn’t plan to turn a profit on the app.

“It’s something fun that promotes Sitening as a company and allows us to demonstrate are range of skills to clients,” he said.

While Sitening does offer application development to its clients, its focus is Internet strategy and consulting services. The exact type of work depends on the client, but many include applications developed for the iPhone or other popular platforms such as the social networking site Facebook, according to Henshaw, who primarily works on the company’s suite of Internet strategy programs called Raven.

Other Nashville-based developers like Firefly Logic and Griffin Technology have also produced iPhone applications that are now available to download for free.

Check back soon for an interview with Dave Delaney about Griffin’s iPhone development efforts.


Digg – Uproxx Media In, Power Users Out

October 13, 2008

Uproxx.com is “a blog network for news and opinion on sports, movies, music, celebrities, fights, gossip, and more” or in other words a clone similar to Gawker Media, which has an insanely large impact for folks who exclusively get their news online. But unlike gawker, I hadn’t heard anything about Uproxx Media until two weeks ago when a banner for the new “Blog Network” popped up on digg.com under the “Integrating with digg”  header. Usually this is where  pronounced media companies like the Wall Street Journal, CBS News, etc. are displayed on the site but recently the rotation has included Uproxx and a handful of its blogs (filmdrunk and withleather).

Not surprisingly, the Uproxx network did not exist prior to a month ago or at the very least it wasn’t indexed by Google very well, which is pretty much the same thing. According to The Way Back Machine the blogs that make up Uproxx’s network did exist — some dating back two years or more — but It is safe to say the network itself is virtually unknown. This made it all the more difficult to find information about the company.

Who owns Uproxx Media and why can’t I find any information freely available online? The only significant piece of information I could find was about their recently inked a deal to be represented by the advertising network YBN Media, who’s client base includes Fark.com and Yardbarker. The positioning on digg makes sense now that they have a worthy ad network behind them, but what is unclear is why digg would promote a virtually unknown blog network. Uproxx can’t possibly deliver a comparible level of traffic to digg.com and it does little to improve the legitimacy of digg as a news gatherer the way the Wall Street Journal could. I’d be interested to find out the reasoning behind this choice.

About the same time Uproxx was featured on digg, something else noteworthy happened: Digg top brass made the decision to ban several of its most active users. The first notable banning was of digg’s third most popular submitter Reg Saddler a.k.a. Zaibatisu and they continued steadily with large groups of users being removed for violating the site’s terms of service. The most referenced reason for banning is due to use of user scripts to artificially alter digg’s heart: the algorithm for choosing front page stories. But not every user received an explanation for why they were banned and not all banned users used scripts.

So we have no definitive reason for the mass banning of highly active digg users and we do not know why newcomer Uproxx Media is featured on the site or who owns them (YBN Media?). I’m not in any position to insinuate that these two things are related. I’m simply describing two notable developments about the site.

Yet, I can’t help but wonder…

Developing